RONULO Versus. Some body
FACTS: Rosa Catholic Parish Chapel of San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte. However, at the time of the relationship, this new heading officiating priest, Fr. Mario Ragaza, refused to solemnize the wedding up on studying your couples failed to safe a married relationship license. As the a beneficial recourse, Joey, who was simply then using barong tagalong, and you may Claire, clothed from inside the a wedding clothes, along with their moms and dads, sponsors and customers, continued for the Separate Chapel from Filipino Christians, known as brand new Aglipayan Chapel. It expected the new petitioner, an enthusiastic Aglipayan priest, to perform a service to which the second agreed even with already been informed by the couple that they had no relationships certification.
Brand new petitioner prepared their choir and you may scheduled a size to your few on a single time. He used the new ceremony from the presence of the bridegroom, the fresh bride, its mothers, the main and you will additional sponsors together with rest of its desired guests.
The newest prosecution’s American Sites dating app reviews witnesses, Joseph and you will Mary Anne Yere, affirmed on the occurrences of your service. Joseph was the veil sponsor when you’re Mary Anne was the brand new cable mentor throughout the marriage. Mary Anne testified you to definitely she spotted the latest bride-to-be walk-down this new section. She also noticed the couple change its marriage rings, kiss both, and signal a document. She heard the petitioner instructing the primary sponsors in order to signal the brand new matrimony deal. After that, they decided to go to the fresh new lobby, got dinner and grabbed photo. She noticed this new petitioner indeed there.
Fl Umadac, the mother out-of Joey, testified you to she read the couple claim in the ceremony you to they capture each other since the husband and wife. Weeks following the relationship, she went along to this new civil regional civil registrar out of San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte having Atty. Mariano R. Nalupta Jr. in which she gotten a certification you to no matrimony license is actually awarded on the pair.
The fresh new petitioner, while admitting which he conducted a ceremony, refused one their operate regarding true blessing the happy couple are tantamount so you’re able to good solemnization of your relationship while the contemplated legally.
ISSUE: Acquired the fresh petitioner try responsible for breaking Post 352 of one’s Revised Penal Code (RPC) to have presumably creating an unlawful wedding service.
She plus known the marriage invite provided to the woman by Joey
RATIO: Petitioner used an illegal marriage ceremony. Brand new crime while the sent to during the Art 352 of the RPC refers to the overall performance regarding ily Password and that checks out:
(3) A married relationship ceremony that takes put with the appearance of the latest contracting parties before the solemnizing officer and their individual declaration that it grab one another given that husband and wife on the presence out of for around a couple witnesses off courtroom decades.
Ways. 6. No given setting or religious rite towards solemnization of matrimony is required. They are going to be necessary, not, for the employing activities to seem truly before the solemnizing officer and claim in the exposure regarding for around a couple witnesses from courtroom age that they take both due to the fact spouse and you can girlfriend. That it statement shall be contained in the matrimony certificate which should become closed of the employing parties in addition to their witnesses and you will attested of the solemnizing administrator.
This new Finest Judge said one to what produced this new petitioner’s operate an excellent marriage service and not just blessing are you to definitely if you are there’s absolutely no recommended mode otherwise religious rite, all that was required is actually “on the hiring functions to seem individually until the solemnizing administrator and state regarding the presence out of no less than several witnesses out-of judge decades which they bring each other given that husband and you can wife.”
About what earliest requirement, the petitioner acknowledge that the parties appeared ahead of him and that fact was affirmed so you can of the witnesses. Into the next demands, we find that, against the petitioner’s allegation, the fresh prosecution seems, from the testimony regarding witnesses, your contracting functions directly announced that they just take one another because wife and husband. Therefore, it’s clear one petitioner used a wedding ceremony and never just true blessing.